John Lackey was no help for WallaWalla after being ejected for throwing at Ian Kinsler
While it is true he was no help, he also didn't hurt WallaWalla, as 0 IP, 0 ER, 1 HBP, 0 H, 0 BB, 0 K has no effect whatsoever on any of the five pitching categories (W, SV, K, ERA, WHIP).
The Players...ended with a .345 average for the week. The Alliance kept pace with Huapaya, batting .335.
Actually, they nearly kept pace. Had they actually kept pace, they would not have lost the category.
Hopefully the return of Soria and Valverde will give [the Alliance] a much needed boost.
Seeing as how they have won saves in five of the six weeks, the addition of two closers will likely not give as much of a boost as some of the other injured players, such as Aramis Ramirez, Chris Carpenter (back this Wednesday), Hiroki Kuroda, or Justin Duchscherer, should. It can be noted, however, that the closers might provide a small amount of help in the ERA and WHIP categories.
Chipper Jones and Mike Jacobs paved the way for Ohio
More so than Brian Roberts? He had over twice as many runs, the same amount of HR, as well as better RBI and SB numbers than Jones. He also bested Jacobs in 4 of the 5 batting categories. Similarly, Juan Pierre led Chipper in 3 of 5 categories and Jacobs once again in 4 of 5. Carlos Beltran did as well. It seems to me that Jones and Jacobs didn't actually do much paving. Maybe Roberts, Pierre, and Beltran laid down the tar, and then Jones and Jacobs worked the steamrollers?
Ohio’s core of pitchers captured a very respectable 7 wins. Despite these good numbers, Lima Time was better in ERA, WHIP, and Saves.
This makes it seem like there is some sort of correlation between wins and saves. This is (obviously) the case in real baseball, but not the case in fantasy.
You can attribute this win to a great pitching performance...by South Carolina.
South Carolina had 4 W, 1 SV, 74 K, 1 3.16 ERA and a 1.36 WHIP on the week. Is that really great? Sure, it was good compared to his opponent (San Diego), as the Force went 3-0-2 in pitching categories this week. But great? In the same week, Milltown had 5 W, 1 SV, 74 K, a 5.03 ERA, and a 1.36 WHIP, which was good enough to tie South Carolina in SV, K, and WHIP, beat them in W, and lose in ERA. So would you consider Milltown to have also had a "great" week?
Apart from South Carolina's week 6 performance, there have been a total of 71 weeks of team stats so far. From those, 52% matched or beat the Force's wins for week 6. It was 94% for SV, 18% for K, 28% for ERA, and 45% for WHIP. I would not consider any of these to be great. Even the stat that seems to be the best, strikeouts, is only better than 82 percent of the other weeks, which can hardly be considered great.
Week 6 Power Rankings
See last week's blog for an explanation, but basically, these rankings come from no opinions and are strictly based on team totals.
| Rank | Change | Team Name | Score | SOS Rank | Actual |
| 1 | - | San Diego Stingers | 4.05 | 7 | 2 |
| 2 | - | Milltown Monsters | 2.52 | 8 | 1 |
| 3 | - | The Alliance | 0.69 | 2 | 11 |
| 4 | +4 | Huapaya Players | 0.09 | 5 | 4 |
| 5 | +6 | Ohio Hustlers | 0.03 | 10 | 7 |
| 6 | -1 | Lima Time | -0.01 | 9 | 7 |
| 7 | -1 | GA Cottonpickers | -0.31 | 1 | 3 |
| 8 | +2 | South Carolina Force | -0.71 | 3 | 5 |
| 9 | -5 | So Cho Guiney's | -0.79 | 12 | 5 |
| 10 | -3 | WallaWalla DirtDawgs | -1.13 | 11 | 9 |
| 11 | +1 | Arlington Templars | -1.92 | 4 | 12 |
| 12 | -3 | Cape Cod Cods | -2.52 | 6 | 10 |
Once again, San Diego is clearly at the top, although Milltown has closed the gap a bit. The Alliance still inexplicably lies in third place as they continue to lose. Perhaps the weekly totals are good, just not quite good enough?
Unfortunately, the other power rankings (Austin Power Rankings) have been changed to some sort of formula that seems far less complicated than mine. It really is too bad, as I enjoyed reading the justification for where each team was ranked in the old system. While the new system may be flawed (here is where I pretend mine isn't), I would like to hope that Austin will combine the new and the old next week, giving his rank from the formula but still providing insight into each team.
That's my two cents for this week. Until next week, to the three (give or take a few) people who read this, goodnight and have a pleasant tomorrow.